📊 Evidence-Based Reference

cardiac pacing electrode

Medi-Dyne Instruments

Summary: The cardiac pacing electrode by Medi-Dyne Instruments is a device used for cardiac pacing. It was FDA cleared via the 510k pathway. Key evidence highlights its stability and potential complications.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway 510K
Decision Date December 5, 1979
Product Code DTB
Device Class Class 3
Evidence 0 studies

The cardiac pacing electrode was cleared by the FDA through the 510k pathway on December 5, 1979. It is manufactured by Medi-Dyne Instruments and classified as a Class 3 device.

What It Is

The cardiac pacing electrode is designed to provide electrical stimulation to the heart to maintain an adequate heart rate. It is used in patients with arrhythmias or heart block to ensure proper cardiac function.

Clinical Applications

Commonly used in scenarios such as bradycardia or heart block, the cardiac pacing electrode is crucial in maintaining heart rhythm. It is often employed in both temporary and permanent pacing situations.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes 9 studies, with a mix of retrospective, prospective, and other study types. The studies span from 1976 to recent years, providing insights into device performance and safety.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the cardiac pacing electrode is generally effective in maintaining cardiac rhythm. A method for estimating electrode stability has been described, highlighting its reliability in clinical use.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include rare occurrences of electrode fracture and pacing failure. One study noted an unusual fracture of the electrode, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the small number of studies and the lack of recent large-scale trials. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and newer electrode designs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for cardiac pacing electrode?

The device is indicated for use in patients requiring cardiac pacing due to arrhythmias or heart block.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective maintenance of cardiac rhythm and methods for assessing electrode stability.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate rare instances of electrode fracture and pacing failure.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 Stay Updated

Get the latest vascular education content delivered to your inbox.