Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter Models 466-f200a 466-f200b
FDA Clearance Information
The Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter was cleared via the FDA 510(k) pathway on October 18, 2002. It is manufactured by Cordis and classified as a Class 2 medical device.
What It Is
FDA-Cleared Indications
- Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping thrombi in the inferior vena cava.
- Use in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism who have a contraindication to anticoagulant therapy.
- Use in patients with recurrent pulmonary embolism despite anticoagulant therapy.
Clinical Applications
- Permanent IVC filter placement for pulmonary embolism prevention.
- Protection from pulmonary embolism in patients with venous thromboembolism who cannot receive anticoagulation.
- Pulmonary embolism prevention when embolic events recur despite anticoagulant therapy.
Reported off-label uses
- Temporary protection during a short period of exceptionally high embolic risk when anticoagulation cannot be used, although this permanent filter is not designed for routine retrieval.
- Use in selected patients with free-floating or large deep-vein thrombus when clinicians judge pulmonary embolism risk to be substantial.
Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.
Evidence Summary
Reported Outcomes
Safety Profile
Evidence Limitations
Practical Considerations
- The listed models are 466-F200A and 466-F200B; the appropriate filter size and delivery system depend on IVC diameter and the device labeling.
- Placement is generally performed through percutaneous venous access, commonly the internal jugular or common femoral vein, using fluoroscopic imaging.
- This is a permanent filter. Retrieval is not the intended routine management, and later removal may be difficult or not possible.
- Patients should be evaluated for contraindications, including unsuitable IVC anatomy, active infection at the access site, or other conditions identified in the current manufacturer labeling.
- MRI safety and scanning conditions must be confirmed from the current device-specific labeling and implant documentation before MRI.
Procedures that use this device
Linked Studies (15)
Endovascular retrieval of a fractured Optease inferior vena cava filter using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance.
Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →The use of optional inferior vena cava filters of type Optease in trauma patients--a single type of filter in a single Medical Center.
Thrombosis research
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Troubleshooting OptEase inferior vena cava filter retrieval.
Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Difficult OptEase filter retrievals after prolonged indwelling times.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →Long-term safety and effectiveness of the "OptEase" vena cava filter.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Update on vena cava filters.
Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Histology of tissue adherent to OptEase inferior vena cava filters regarding indwelling time.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →OptEase and TrapEase vena cava filters: a single-center experience in 258 patients.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Retrospective View Source →Long-term retrievability of IVC filters: should we abandon permanent devices?
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Form and function of vena cava filters: how do optional filters measure up?
Vascular
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience.
Vascular
View Source →Protection From Pulmonary Embolism With the Permanent OptEase™ Filter (PROOF)
View Source →Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter?
The filter is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism who have contraindications to anticoagulation or have experienced recurrent embolism despite treatment.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism, with challenges in retrieval after prolonged use.
What complications have been reported?
Complications include filter fracture, IVC occlusion, perforation, and retrieval difficulties after long indwelling times.