📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter Models 466-f200a 466-f200b

Cordis US Corp.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter is a device used to prevent pulmonary embolism by trapping blood clots. Key evidence highlights long-term complications and retrieval challenges.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K023116 ↗
Decision Date ? October 18, 2002
Product Code ? DTK Filter, Intravascular, Cardiovascular
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 15 studies

The Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter was cleared via the FDA 510(k) pathway on October 18, 2002. It is manufactured by Cordis and classified as a Class 2 medical device.

What It Is

The Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter is designed to capture thrombi in the inferior vena cava, preventing them from reaching the pulmonary arteries. It is intended for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism, especially those with contraindications to anticoagulation.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping thrombi in the inferior vena cava.
  • Use in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism who have a contraindication to anticoagulant therapy.
  • Use in patients with recurrent pulmonary embolism despite anticoagulant therapy.

Clinical Applications

  • Permanent IVC filter placement for pulmonary embolism prevention.
  • Protection from pulmonary embolism in patients with venous thromboembolism who cannot receive anticoagulation.
  • Pulmonary embolism prevention when embolic events recur despite anticoagulant therapy.

Reported off-label uses

  • Temporary protection during a short period of exceptionally high embolic risk when anticoagulation cannot be used, although this permanent filter is not designed for routine retrieval.
  • Use in selected patients with free-floating or large deep-vein thrombus when clinicians judge pulmonary embolism risk to be substantial.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes 11 studies, comprising various study types such as retrospective and prospective analyses, published between 2009 and 2018. These studies evaluate the efficacy, safety, and complications of the device.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Cordis Optease filter effectively prevents pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients. However, retrieval can be challenging after prolonged indwelling times, requiring unconventional techniques. The device has been shown to be effective in specific clinical scenarios, such as during term pregnancy.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include filter fracture, inferior vena cava occlusion, and perforation, particularly with long-term use. Difficulties in retrieval after extended indwelling times have also been documented.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the lack of long-term imaging follow-up and reliance on mathematical projections for complication rates. Further research is needed to assess long-term safety and efficacy in diverse patient populations.

Practical Considerations

  • The listed models are 466-F200A and 466-F200B; the appropriate filter size and delivery system depend on IVC diameter and the device labeling.
  • Placement is generally performed through percutaneous venous access, commonly the internal jugular or common femoral vein, using fluoroscopic imaging.
  • This is a permanent filter. Retrieval is not the intended routine management, and later removal may be difficult or not possible.
  • Patients should be evaluated for contraindications, including unsuitable IVC anatomy, active infection at the access site, or other conditions identified in the current manufacturer labeling.
  • MRI safety and scanning conditions must be confirmed from the current device-specific labeling and implant documentation before MRI.

Procedures that use this device

Linked Studies (15)

PubMed • 2023

Endovascular retrieval of a fractured Optease inferior vena cava filter using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance.

Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2016

The use of optional inferior vena cava filters of type Optease in trauma patients--a single type of filter in a single Medical Center.

Thrombosis research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2016

Troubleshooting OptEase inferior vena cava filter retrieval.

Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2016

Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Difficult OptEase filter retrievals after prolonged indwelling times.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Long-term safety and effectiveness of the "OptEase" vena cava filter.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2010

Update on vena cava filters.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Histology of tissue adherent to OptEase inferior vena cava filters regarding indwelling time.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2009

OptEase and TrapEase vena cava filters: a single-center experience in 258 patients.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

Retrospective View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Long-term retrievability of IVC filters: should we abandon permanent devices?

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Form and function of vena cava filters: how do optional filters measure up?

Vascular

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2006

The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2006

OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience.

Vascular

View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Protection From Pulmonary Embolism With the Permanent OptEase™ Filter (PROOF)

View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Cordis Optease Permanent Vena Cava Filter?

The filter is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism who have contraindications to anticoagulation or have experienced recurrent embolism despite treatment.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism, with challenges in retrieval after prolonged use.

What complications have been reported?

Complications include filter fracture, IVC occlusion, perforation, and retrieval difficulties after long indwelling times.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you