Cordis Trapease Permanent Vena Cava Filter and Introduction Kit
FDA Clearance Information
The Cordis Trapease Permanent Vena Cava Filter was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on July 7, 2000. It is manufactured by Cordis and classified as a Class 2 medical device.
What It Is
FDA-Cleared Indications
- Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping thrombi in the inferior vena cava.
- Use in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism when anticoagulation is contraindicated.
- Use in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism in whom anticoagulant therapy has failed.
Clinical Applications
- Permanent inferior vena cava filter placement for selected patients with venous thromboembolism.
- Pulmonary embolism prevention when anticoagulant medication cannot be used because of bleeding risk or another contraindication.
- Pulmonary embolism prevention when embolic events recur despite appropriate anticoagulant therapy.
Reported off-label uses
- Temporary protection from pulmonary embolism during a period of exceptionally high clot risk when anticoagulation is temporarily unsuitable; permanent implantation may be inappropriate if retrieval is not planned or possible.
- Prophylactic placement in selected patients without documented venous thromboembolism but with perceived high risk of pulmonary embolism; evidence and appropriateness vary by patient.
Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.
Evidence Summary
Reported Outcomes
Safety Profile
Evidence Limitations
Practical Considerations
- The TrapEase filter is intended for permanent implantation and is not a routine retrieval filter; clinicians should confirm that a permanent implant is appropriate before placement.
- Placement is usually performed through femoral or internal jugular venous access under fluoroscopic imaging, with filter sizing and positioning based on inferior vena cava anatomy.
- Potential complications include access-site bleeding, filter migration or tilt, inferior vena cava thrombosis or perforation, recurrent pulmonary embolism, and filter fracture; anticoagulation does not necessarily eliminate the need for follow-up.
- MRI conditions and compatibility should be confirmed in the current Cordis labeling and facility MRI policy before scanning, including field strength and device-specific conditions.
- The filter does not treat the underlying clot. When safe and appropriate, anticoagulation remains an important treatment for venous thromboembolism, and contraindications to anticoagulation should be reassessed.
Procedures that use this device
Linked Studies (13)
Outcomes of the TrapEase inferior vena cava filter over 10 years at a single health care system.
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Retrospective View Source →Percutaneous Retrieval of Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filters.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Double Barrel In Situ Recanalization of Thrombosed Nonretrievable IVC filter.
Annals of vascular surgery
View Source →Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Tips and tricks for retrieval of permanent TRAPEASE filters for inferior vena cava.
Vascular
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Endovascular removal of a permanent "TrapEase" inferior vena cava filter.
Vascular and endovascular surgery
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Endovascular retrieval of a TrapEase permanent inferior vena cava filter from the aorta.
Journal of vascular surgery
Case Series View Source →OptEase and TrapEase vena cava filters: a single-center experience in 258 patients.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Retrospective View Source →The mid-term efficacy and safety of a permanent nitinol IVC filter(TrapEase).
Korean journal of radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Vena cava filter behavior and endovascular response: an experimental in vivo study.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Other View Source →Preliminary results of the new 6F TrapEase inferior vena cava filter.
Annals of vascular surgery
Retrospective View Source →Technique for retrieval of a guidewire lodged in a vena cava filter.
Vascular and endovascular surgery
Other View Source →The 6-F nitinol TrapEase inferior vena cava filter: results of a prospective multicenter trial.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
Prospective View Source →Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for Cordis Trapease Permanent Vena Cava Filter?
The device is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism who cannot undergo anticoagulation therapy.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Studies report effective prevention of clinical pulmonary embolism with no filter migration or fracture.
What complications have been reported?
Safety data indicate rare cases of asymptomatic total cava thrombosis and potential long-term complications like IVC occlusion.