📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Denali Filter System - Femoral Delivery Kit Denali Filter System - Jugular Subclavain Delivery Kit

C. R. Bard, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Denali Filter System by C.R. Bard is an FDA-cleared device used for preventing pulmonary embolism by capturing blood clots in the inferior vena cava. Key evidence includes studies on retrieval challenges and radiographic findings.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K143208 ↗
Decision Date ? December 9, 2014
Product Code ? DTK Filter, Intravascular, Cardiovascular
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 8 studies

The Denali Filter System was cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) pathway on December 9, 2014. It is manufactured by C.R. Bard and classified as a Class 2 medical device.

What It Is

The Denali Filter System is a medical device designed to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing thrombi in the inferior vena cava. It is intended for temporary or permanent placement in patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping thrombi in the inferior vena cava.
  • Use in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism when protection from pulmonary embolism is clinically indicated.
  • Placement through femoral, jugular, or subclavian venous access using the corresponding delivery kit.

Clinical Applications

  • Percutaneous placement of an IVC filter in the inferior vena cava.
  • Pulmonary embolism protection for patients with venous thromboembolism who cannot receive anticoagulation.
  • Temporary or permanent IVC filter placement when clinically indicated for thromboembolic disease.
  • Use with imaging guidance to position and deploy the filter in the IVC.

Reported off-label uses

  • Prophylactic placement in selected patients considered to have a very high risk of pulmonary embolism but no documented venous thromboembolism.
  • Placement in selected trauma or surgical patients when anticoagulation is temporarily contraindicated.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The literature includes three studies: a case report from 2022, a retrospective study from 2017, and an ongoing clinical trial. These studies explore retrieval techniques, radiographic findings, and preventive efficacy.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report challenges in filter retrieval due to tilt and attachment to vessel walls. Radiographic studies highlight the association between device distress and venous stenosis or occlusion. Ongoing trials aim to assess preventive efficacy against pulmonary embolism.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include difficulty in retrieval due to filter tilt and vessel wall attachment. Radiographic findings suggest potential venous stenosis or occlusion associated with device placement.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the small number of studies and lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy, as well as optimal retrieval techniques.

Practical Considerations

  • The system includes femoral and jugular/subclavian delivery kits; the access route is selected based on venous anatomy, thrombus location, and the planned filter position.
  • Placement is generally performed with fluoroscopic imaging, often with local anesthesia and moderate sedation.
  • The filter may be intended for temporary retrieval or left in place permanently; retrieval planning and follow-up are important because long-term indwelling filters can develop complications.
  • Before placement, clinicians assess for IVC thrombosis, abnormal IVC anatomy, infection, bleeding risk, and other contraindications to venous access or filter deployment.
  • MRI conditions and device-specific size, deployment, and retrieval instructions should be confirmed in the current manufacturer labeling before MRI or intervention.

Procedures that use this device

Linked Studies (8)

PubMed • 2024

Characteristics of Option and Denali Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Annals of vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Filter tilting and retrievability of the Celect and Denali inferior vena cava filters using propensity score-matching analysis.

European journal of radiology open

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Device for retrieval of vena cava filter with combination of a multi-loop snare and Amplatz catheter.

SAGE open medical case reports

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Denali, Tulip, and Option Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: A Single Center Experience.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Retrieval characteristics of the Bard Denali and Argon Option inferior vena cava filters.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Bard Denali Filter Fractures.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR

View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of the Bard® Denali™ Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filter System

View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

ODEN Trial: Option vs. Denali IVC Filters

View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Denali Filter System?

The Denali Filter System is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism, particularly when anticoagulation therapy is contraindicated.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report challenges in retrieval due to filter tilt and vessel wall attachment, and radiographic findings of venous stenosis or occlusion.

What complications have been reported?

Reported complications include difficulty in retrieval and potential venous stenosis or occlusion associated with the device.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you