📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Diamondback 360 Degree Orbital Atherectomy System

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System is a device used for atherectomy procedures, primarily in treating calcified coronary and peripheral arterial lesions. Key evidence highlights its efficacy in improving blood flow in calcified lesions.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K072800 ↗
Decision Date ? October 25, 2007
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 19 studies

The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on October 25, 2007. Manufactured by Cardiovascular Systems, it is classified as a Class 2 device.

What It Is

The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System is designed to remove atherosclerotic plaque from blood vessels. It uses a diamond-coated crown that rotates at high speeds to sand away calcified plaque, improving blood flow in affected arteries.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions in peripheral arteries that are suitable for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
  • Treatment of severely calcified coronary artery lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, when covered by the specific system labeling.
  • Modification of calcified plaque to facilitate balloon angioplasty or other endovascular treatment.

Clinical Applications

  • Atherectomy or plaque modification in selected calcified peripheral arterial lesions.
  • Preparation of calcified peripheral lesions before balloon angioplasty.
  • Plaque modification in selected severely calcified coronary lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention, when included in the applicable device labeling.
  • Treatment planning for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease when calcification may limit balloon expansion.

Reported off-label uses

  • Use in selected below-the-knee or other small-vessel lesions beyond the specific cleared labeling.
  • Use in heavily calcified lesions or vascular segments not specifically covered by the applicable catheter indication.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes a mix of RCTs, prospective, and retrospective studies, with a total of 6 studies ranging from 2008 to 2023. These studies evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device in various clinical settings.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report favorable procedural outcomes with the Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System, including improved blood flow and reduced symptoms in patients with calcified lesions. Optical coherence tomography imaging has quantified the ablation volume, demonstrating its efficacy in lesion modification.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include potential vascular injury due to the high-speed rotation of the device. However, studies generally indicate a favorable safety profile with no significant increase in adverse events compared to other atherectomy devices.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the relatively small sample sizes and the lack of long-term follow-up data in some studies. Further research is needed to establish long-term outcomes and to compare its efficacy directly with other atherectomy systems.

Practical Considerations

  • The system is available with different catheter and crown configurations; vessel-size compatibility, guidewire requirements, and treatment limits must be checked in the current instructions for use.
  • It is advanced over a guidewire under fluoroscopic imaging, usually through femoral or radial access depending on the vascular territory and operator approach.
  • Treatment commonly uses short activation runs with saline or other required flushing and controlled advancement; prolonged activation or excessive force can increase the risk of vessel injury, embolization, heat generation, or device malfunction.
  • The device is not a substitute for treatment of every arterial blockage. Balloon angioplasty, stenting, drug therapy, bypass surgery, or other atherectomy systems may be appropriate alternatives.
  • MRI safety depends on the specific catheter and whether it remains in the patient; the current device labeling should be reviewed before MRI. The system is generally used as a temporary procedural device and is not implanted for long-term therapy.

Linked Studies (19)

PubMed • 2023

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Cureus

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2023

Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Japan-USA Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Lesions: COAST Study, Harmonization by Doing Proof-of-Concept.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Coronary orbital atherectomy using a five-French guiding catheter.

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

View Source →
PubMed • 2021

Is crossability of the classic crown with the glide assist superior to the micro crown in the Diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system?

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Orbital atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal lesions: a current review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery

View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Iliofemoral peripheral orbital atherectomy for optimizing TAVR access: An innovative strategy in the absence of alternative access options.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approach.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Critical hand ischemia treatment via orbital atherectomy-A single center observational retrospective analysis.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Evaluation of the Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified lesions.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial).

The American journal of cardiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital atherectomy: device evolution and clinical data.

The Journal of invasive cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Orbital atherectomy for symptomatic lower extremity disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optimal techniques with the Diamondback 360° System achieve effective results for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: the Diamondback 360 degrees Orbital Atherectomy System.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System?

The device is indicated for the treatment of calcified coronary and peripheral arterial lesions, particularly in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease or coronary artery disease.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies have reported improved blood flow and reduced symptoms in patients with calcified lesions, with favorable procedural outcomes.

What complications have been reported?

Reported complications include potential vascular injury, but overall, the device has a favorable safety profile with no significant increase in adverse events.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you