📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System Stealth 360 Orbital Pad System

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System is a device used for the treatment of calcified coronary and peripheral artery lesions. Key evidence suggests its cost-effectiveness and efficacy in debulking calcified lesions.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K111388 ↗
Decision Date ? July 26, 2011
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 19 studies

The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on July 26, 2011. It is manufactured by Cardiovascular Systems and classified as a Class 2 device.

What It Is

The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System is designed to remove calcified plaque from coronary and peripheral arteries. It utilizes a diamond-coated crown that rotates to sand away plaque, facilitating subsequent angioplasty or stenting.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Treatment of de novo and restenotic lesions in peripheral arteries.
  • Treatment of calcified lesions in the peripheral vasculature to facilitate balloon angioplasty or stent placement.
  • Use in peripheral arteries with reference vessel diameters within the limits specified in the device labeling.

Clinical Applications

  • Atherectomy of calcified peripheral arterial lesions before balloon angioplasty.
  • Lesion preparation before peripheral vascular stent placement.
  • Treatment of severely calcified peripheral artery disease when balloon angioplasty alone may not adequately expand the vessel.
  • Modification of plaque in selected lower-extremity peripheral arteries according to the specific system and catheter labeling.

Reported off-label uses

  • Coronary orbital atherectomy is used in clinical practice with coronary-specific versions of the Diamondback system, but the 2011 clearance identified here is for the peripheral system and should not be assumed to cover coronary use.
  • Treatment of heavily calcified dialysis access lesions has been reported in clinical practice, but this is not necessarily covered by the peripheral labeling and should be evaluated against the current device instructions.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes 11 studies, comprising randomized controlled trials and observational studies, conducted between 2013 and 2017. These studies evaluate the device's cost-effectiveness, efficacy, and safety in various clinical settings.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report favorable procedural outcomes with the Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System, including improved vessel patency and reduced restenosis rates. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest economic benefits when used in conjunction with balloon angioplasty compared to angioplasty alone.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include potential vessel injury and dissection, which are inherent risks of atherectomy procedures. However, the studies reviewed did not highlight any new or unexpected safety concerns specific to this device.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the relatively small sample sizes and short follow-up durations in some studies. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and to compare the device's efficacy directly with other atherectomy systems.

Practical Considerations

  • The system includes different catheter sizes and crown configurations; the selected catheter must match the target vessel diameter and the current instructions for use.
  • It is advanced over a compatible guidewire through vascular access, commonly from the femoral or radial artery depending on the treatment site and operator approach.
  • The operator uses fluoroscopic imaging and controlled rotational advancement; prolonged treatment in one location can increase the risk of vessel injury, embolization, or slow flow.
  • Contraindications and warnings include unsuitable vessel anatomy, severe dissection, acute thrombus, inability to cross the lesion, and other conditions listed in the current labeling.
  • MRI safety depends on the specific catheter and whether it remains in the body; the device should be removed after treatment, and the current manufacturer MRI instructions should be checked before scanning.

Linked Studies (19)

PubMed • 2023

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Cureus

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2023

Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Japan-USA Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Lesions: COAST Study, Harmonization by Doing Proof-of-Concept.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Coronary orbital atherectomy using a five-French guiding catheter.

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

View Source →
PubMed • 2021

Is crossability of the classic crown with the glide assist superior to the micro crown in the Diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system?

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Orbital atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal lesions: a current review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery

View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Iliofemoral peripheral orbital atherectomy for optimizing TAVR access: An innovative strategy in the absence of alternative access options.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approach.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Critical hand ischemia treatment via orbital atherectomy-A single center observational retrospective analysis.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Evaluation of the Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified lesions.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial).

The American journal of cardiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital atherectomy: device evolution and clinical data.

The Journal of invasive cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Orbital atherectomy for symptomatic lower extremity disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optimal techniques with the Diamondback 360° System achieve effective results for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: the Diamondback 360 degrees Orbital Atherectomy System.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System?

The device is indicated for the treatment of severely calcified coronary and peripheral artery lesions, particularly when traditional angioplasty is inadequate.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report improved vessel patency and cost-effectiveness when used with balloon angioplasty, with favorable procedural outcomes.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate risks of vessel injury and dissection, common to atherectomy procedures, but no unique safety concerns were identified.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you