📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is used for plaque modification in peripheral artery disease. Key evidence highlights its role in facilitating revascularization and addressing calcified lesions.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K133399 ↗
Decision Date ? November 22, 2013
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 19 studies

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System was cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) pathway on November 22, 2013. It is manufactured by Cardiovascular Systems and classified as a Class 2 device.

What It Is

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is a device designed to modify plaque in peripheral arteries. It uses an orbital mechanism to sand away calcified plaque, facilitating subsequent revascularization procedures.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions in peripheral arteries.
  • Plaque modification in peripheral arterial lesions, including severely calcified lesions.
  • Use in vessels with reference diameters within the device's labeled range and accessible through the approved catheter system.

Clinical Applications

  • Plaque modification before balloon angioplasty in calcified peripheral artery disease.
  • Preparation of peripheral arterial lesions before stent placement when indicated.
  • Treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions in lower-extremity peripheral arteries.
  • Facilitation of peripheral arterial revascularization when calcium limits balloon expansion or device delivery.

Reported off-label uses

  • Plaque modification in selected arterial beds or vessel sizes outside the device's specific labeling.
  • Use in heavily calcified lesions to facilitate vascular access for structural heart procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The literature includes various study types such as retrospective analyses and case series, with a total of 7 studies published between 2015 and 2020. These studies explore both clinical efficacy and economic impact.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Diamondback 360 system is effective in modifying calcified plaques, facilitating successful revascularization. It has been shown to improve access for TAVR and reduce the need for alternative access routes. Economic analyses suggest cost benefits when combined with balloon angioplasty.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include guidewire fractures during procedures, as noted in the MAUDE database. Other studies have not systematically documented adverse events, indicating a need for further safety evaluations.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Most studies are observational or retrospective, which may introduce bias. Further research is needed to systematically assess long-term safety and efficacy.

Practical Considerations

  • The system is available with different catheter and crown configurations; the selected size must match the target vessel diameter and lesion location according to the current labeling.
  • It is advanced over a guidewire through vascular access, commonly from the femoral or radial artery depending on the treatment territory and operator preference.
  • Treatment requires fluoroscopic imaging and careful control of orbital speed, treatment time, and forward or backward movement to reduce the risk of vessel injury, perforation, embolization, or thrombosis.
  • The device is intended for single-use catheter procedures and is not a permanent implant; it does not remain in the body after treatment.
  • MRI safety and conditions depend on the specific system components and any other implanted devices. The current manufacturer's instructions for use and MRI labeling should be checked before scanning.

Linked Studies (19)

PubMed • 2023

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Cureus

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2023

Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Japan-USA Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Lesions: COAST Study, Harmonization by Doing Proof-of-Concept.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Coronary orbital atherectomy using a five-French guiding catheter.

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

View Source →
PubMed • 2021

Is crossability of the classic crown with the glide assist superior to the micro crown in the Diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system?

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Orbital atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal lesions: a current review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery

View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Iliofemoral peripheral orbital atherectomy for optimizing TAVR access: An innovative strategy in the absence of alternative access options.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approach.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Critical hand ischemia treatment via orbital atherectomy-A single center observational retrospective analysis.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Evaluation of the Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified lesions.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial).

The American journal of cardiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital atherectomy: device evolution and clinical data.

The Journal of invasive cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Orbital atherectomy for symptomatic lower extremity disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optimal techniques with the Diamondback 360° System achieve effective results for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: the Diamondback 360 degrees Orbital Atherectomy System.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System?

The device is indicated for plaque modification in peripheral artery disease, particularly in cases with significant calcification.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective plaque modification, improved revascularization success, and potential cost savings when used with balloon angioplasty.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate guidewire fractures as a complication, with limited systematic documentation of other adverse events.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you