📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is a device used for plaque modification in peripheral artery disease. It is primarily used to facilitate percutaneous revascularization. Key evidence highlights its use in critical limb ischemia and optimizing TAVR access.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K150732 ↗
Decision Date ? April 13, 2015
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 19 studies

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System was cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) pathway on April 13, 2015. It is manufactured by Cardiovascular Systems and is classified as a Class 2 device under product code MCW.

What It Is

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is a minimally invasive device designed to remove plaque from peripheral arteries. It uses orbital motion to sand away calcified plaque, facilitating improved blood flow and enabling subsequent interventions such as angioplasty.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Treatment of peripheral vascular disease in patients with stenotic or occlusive lesions.
  • Plaque modification in peripheral arteries to facilitate subsequent percutaneous revascularization.
  • Use in peripheral vessels appropriate for the device's labeled catheter and guidewire compatibility.

Clinical Applications

  • Plaque modification before balloon angioplasty in heavily calcified peripheral arterial lesions.
  • Preparation of peripheral arterial lesions before stent placement when additional plaque modification is needed.
  • Treatment of calcified lesions associated with lower-extremity peripheral artery disease.
  • Use during catheter-based peripheral revascularization when lesion calcification limits balloon passage or expansion.

Reported off-label uses

  • Plaque modification to facilitate alternative large-bore arterial access, including access considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, when performed outside the device labeling.
  • Use in selected critical limb ischemia cases beyond the specific anatomy or indications described in the cleared labeling.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes a mix of retrospective analyses, observational studies, and case series, with a total of 7 studies published between 2015 and 2020. These studies explore various clinical applications and economic impacts of the device.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is effective in modifying calcified plaques, facilitating successful revascularization. It has been shown to improve access for TAVR procedures and reduce the risk of vessel injury in critical limb ischemia.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include guidewire fractures during the procedure, as noted in a review of the MAUDE database. Other potential adverse events are related to vascular access and procedural risks inherent to atherectomy.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the retrospective nature of many studies and the lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Further research is needed to systematically evaluate long-term outcomes and safety in diverse patient populations.

Practical Considerations

  • The system is delivered through a vascular sheath and guidewire, with the catheter size selected according to the target vessel diameter and lesion anatomy.
  • Treatment requires fluoroscopic imaging and careful advancement, activation, and withdrawal of the orbital atherectomy catheter; operators must follow the manufacturer's instructions for use.
  • Potential complications include arterial perforation or dissection, distal embolization, thrombosis, vasospasm, bleeding, and the need for additional intervention.
  • MRI safety depends on the specific catheter and whether any component remains in the patient; the device should not be considered automatically MRI safe. Review the current labeling before MRI.
  • Treatment may be inappropriate or require special precautions in vessels that are too small, severely tortuous, acutely thrombosed, or otherwise outside the labeled anatomy. It does not replace medication, balloon angioplasty, stenting, or open surgery when those treatments are more appropriate.

Linked Studies (19)

PubMed • 2023

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Cureus

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2023

Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Japan-USA Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Lesions: COAST Study, Harmonization by Doing Proof-of-Concept.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Coronary orbital atherectomy using a five-French guiding catheter.

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

View Source →
PubMed • 2021

Is crossability of the classic crown with the glide assist superior to the micro crown in the Diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system?

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Orbital atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal lesions: a current review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery

View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Iliofemoral peripheral orbital atherectomy for optimizing TAVR access: An innovative strategy in the absence of alternative access options.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approach.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Critical hand ischemia treatment via orbital atherectomy-A single center observational retrospective analysis.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Evaluation of the Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified lesions.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial).

The American journal of cardiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital atherectomy: device evolution and clinical data.

The Journal of invasive cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Orbital atherectomy for symptomatic lower extremity disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optimal techniques with the Diamondback 360° System achieve effective results for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: the Diamondback 360 degrees Orbital Atherectomy System.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System?

The device is indicated for plaque modification in peripheral artery disease, particularly in cases with significant calcification, and for optimizing access in TAVR procedures.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies have reported successful plaque modification, improved revascularization outcomes, and enhanced access for TAVR procedures.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate potential complications such as guidewire fractures and procedural risks associated with vascular access.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you