📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is used for plaque modification in peripheral arterial disease. Key evidence highlights its use in critical limb ischemia and optimizing TAVR access.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K152694 ↗
Decision Date ? October 21, 2015
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 19 studies

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on October 21, 2015. It is manufactured by Cardiovascular Systems and is classified as a Class 2 device.

What It Is

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is a device designed to modify plaque in peripheral arteries. It uses an orbital mechanism to sand away calcified plaque, facilitating revascularization in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Treatment of peripheral arterial disease in the peripheral vasculature.
  • Modification of stenotic lesions, including severely calcified lesions, before or during endovascular treatment.
  • Use in peripheral arteries that can accommodate the system's catheter and orbital atherectomy device.

Clinical Applications

  • Plaque modification in calcified iliac and femoral artery disease before balloon angioplasty.
  • Treatment preparation for calcified infrainguinal peripheral arterial lesions.
  • Vessel preparation before placement of a peripheral stent when calcification limits balloon expansion.
  • Treatment of peripheral arterial stenosis as part of an endovascular revascularization procedure.

Reported off-label uses

  • Plaque modification of heavily calcified iliofemoral arteries to facilitate large-bore access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
  • Treatment of selected calcified peripheral lesions in situations outside the device's specific labeled vessel or lesion criteria.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The literature includes 7 studies, comprising retrospective analyses and observational studies, published between 2015 and 2020. These studies explore various clinical applications and economic impacts of the device.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Diamondback 360 is effective in facilitating revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia and optimizing access for TAVR procedures. It has shown utility in managing heavily calcified arteries where traditional methods may fail.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include guidewire fractures during procedures, as noted in a review of the MAUDE database. These events, while not systematically studied, highlight the need for careful procedural management.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Most studies are observational or retrospective, which may introduce bias. Further research is needed to systematically assess long-term outcomes and safety.

Practical Considerations

  • The system is used over guidewire access under fluoroscopic imaging, usually through femoral or other percutaneous arterial access.
  • Catheter size, guidewire compatibility, treated-vessel diameter, and lesion location must match the specific system configuration and current instructions for use.
  • It is intended for plaque modification, not as a standalone replacement for angioplasty, stenting, bypass surgery, or medical therapy when those treatments are appropriate.
  • Potential complications include dissection, perforation, embolization, thrombosis, spasm, bleeding, and distal ischemia; heavily calcified or tortuous vessels require careful device advancement and technique.
  • MRI safety depends on the specific system components and whether any device remains in the patient; the current labeling should be checked before MRI.

Linked Studies (19)

PubMed • 2023

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Cureus

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2023

Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Japan-USA Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Lesions: COAST Study, Harmonization by Doing Proof-of-Concept.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Coronary orbital atherectomy using a five-French guiding catheter.

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

View Source →
PubMed • 2021

Is crossability of the classic crown with the glide assist superior to the micro crown in the Diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system?

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Orbital atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal lesions: a current review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery

View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Iliofemoral peripheral orbital atherectomy for optimizing TAVR access: An innovative strategy in the absence of alternative access options.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approach.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Critical hand ischemia treatment via orbital atherectomy-A single center observational retrospective analysis.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Evaluation of the Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified lesions.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial).

The American journal of cardiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital atherectomy: device evolution and clinical data.

The Journal of invasive cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Orbital atherectomy for symptomatic lower extremity disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optimal techniques with the Diamondback 360° System achieve effective results for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: the Diamondback 360 degrees Orbital Atherectomy System.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System?

The device is indicated for plaque modification in peripheral arterial disease, particularly in cases with severe calcification.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective revascularization in critical limb ischemia and improved access for TAVR procedures.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate potential for guidewire fractures during procedures, as highlighted in the MAUDE database review.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you