📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is used for plaque modification in peripheral arterial disease. Key evidence highlights its use in critical limb ischemia and optimizing vascular access for TAVR.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K170792 ↗
Decision Date ? June 9, 2017
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 19 studies

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on June 9, 2017. It is manufactured by Cardiovascular Systems and is classified as a Class 2 device.

What It Is

The Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System is a device designed to modify plaque in peripheral arteries. It uses orbital atherectomy technology to treat calcified lesions, facilitating revascularization in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Treatment of stenotic lesions in peripheral arteries caused by atherosclerotic disease.
  • Modification of calcified plaque before or during peripheral vascular intervention.
  • Use in peripheral arteries that can accommodate the system's indicated catheter size and guidewire requirements.

Clinical Applications

  • Plaque modification before balloon angioplasty in peripheral arterial disease.
  • Treatment of calcified lesions in the iliac, femoropopliteal, and below-the-knee peripheral arterial circulation when the specific device configuration is indicated.
  • Lesion preparation before placement of a peripheral vascular stent when additional plaque modification is needed.
  • Treatment of peripheral arterial stenosis as part of an endovascular revascularization procedure.

Reported off-label uses

  • Use in selected vascular-access lesions to facilitate large-bore access for procedures such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement; this application should be evaluated by the treating specialist because it may not match the device labeling.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The literature includes 7 studies, comprising retrospective analyses and observational studies, published between 2015 and 2020. These studies explore various clinical applications and economic impacts of the device.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Diamondback 360 is effective in modifying calcified plaques, aiding in procedures like balloon angioplasty and TAVR. It has been shown to potentially reduce hospital costs when used for critical limb ischemia.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include guidewire fractures during procedures, as noted in the MAUDE database. These incidents highlight the need for careful management during device use.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is primarily retrospective and observational, with limited randomized controlled trials. Further research is needed to systematically assess long-term outcomes and safety across diverse patient populations.

Practical Considerations

  • The system is used over a compatible guidewire through an appropriately sized vascular sheath or catheter, with fluoroscopic imaging and contrast angiography typically used for positioning.
  • Available catheter configurations and vessel-size requirements vary; the operator must confirm the specific model's compatibility with the target vessel, guidewire, and access system.
  • Orbital atherectomy requires controlled device advancement and treatment runs; excessive force, prolonged treatment, or inappropriate speed can increase the risk of vessel injury or embolization.
  • Contraindications and precautions include unsuitable vessel anatomy, severe dissection or perforation, inability to cross the lesion safely, thrombus or significant uncontrolled bleeding risk, and other conditions listed in the device instructions for use.
  • MRI safety depends on the exact component and whether it remains in the patient. The device is generally removed after the procedure; patients should provide the implant or procedure record to the MRI team before scanning.

Linked Studies (19)

PubMed • 2023

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Cureus

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2023

Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Japan-USA Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Lesions: COAST Study, Harmonization by Doing Proof-of-Concept.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Coronary orbital atherectomy using a five-French guiding catheter.

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

View Source →
PubMed • 2021

Is crossability of the classic crown with the glide assist superior to the micro crown in the Diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system?

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Orbital atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal lesions: a current review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery

View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Iliofemoral peripheral orbital atherectomy for optimizing TAVR access: An innovative strategy in the absence of alternative access options.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approach.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Critical hand ischemia treatment via orbital atherectomy-A single center observational retrospective analysis.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Evaluation of the Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified lesions.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial).

The American journal of cardiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital atherectomy: device evolution and clinical data.

The Journal of invasive cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Orbital atherectomy for symptomatic lower extremity disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optimal techniques with the Diamondback 360° System achieve effective results for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: the Diamondback 360 degrees Orbital Atherectomy System.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System?

The device is indicated for plaque modification in peripheral arterial disease, particularly in cases with severe calcification.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective plaque modification, facilitating procedures like angioplasty and TAVR, with potential cost benefits in critical limb ischemia treatment.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate guidewire fractures as a notable complication, requiring careful procedural management.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you