📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter

Cook Incorporated

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter is a device used to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing blood clots. Key evidence highlights its efficacy and safety in various clinical scenarios.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K072240 ↗
Decision Date ? November 8, 2007
Product Code ? DTK Filter, Intravascular, Cardiovascular
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 10 studies

The Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter was cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) pathway on November 8, 2007. It is manufactured by Cook and classified as a Class 2 medical device.

What It Is

The Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter is a retrievable filter designed to be placed in the inferior vena cava to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing embolic material. It is intended for temporary or permanent use in patients at risk of thromboembolic events.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping embolic material in the inferior vena cava.
  • Use in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism, including patients with venous thromboembolism.
  • Use when anticoagulation is contraindicated, ineffective, or cannot be used.
  • The filter may be used temporarily or left in place permanently when clinically indicated.

Clinical Applications

  • Placement in the inferior vena cava for patients with deep vein thrombosis who are at risk for pulmonary embolism.
  • Pulmonary embolism protection when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated.
  • Pulmonary embolism protection when anticoagulation is ineffective or cannot be tolerated.
  • Temporary protection during a period of elevated thromboembolic risk, with retrieval considered when protection is no longer needed.
  • Permanent filtration when ongoing pulmonary embolism risk or clinical circumstances support leaving the filter in place.

Reported off-label uses

  • Prophylactic placement in selected trauma or surgical patients without confirmed venous thromboembolism but considered to have a high risk of pulmonary embolism.
  • Use in selected patients with recurrent pulmonary embolism despite therapeutic anticoagulation.
  • Placement in an anatomical location other than the standard infrarenal inferior vena cava in selected complex cases.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes 11 studies, comprising case series and retrospective analyses, published between 2011 and 2020. These studies evaluate the filter's efficacy, safety, and retrieval outcomes.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter is effective in preventing pulmonary embolism in patients with thromboembolic risk. Midterm outcomes indicate satisfactory filter integrity and efficacy, with successful retrieval in many cases.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include filter migration, perforation of the vena cava wall, and difficulty in retrieval due to thrombus formation or filter tilt. These events highlight the importance of careful patient selection and monitoring.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the small sample sizes and retrospective nature of many studies. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and optimize retrieval techniques.

Practical Considerations

  • The device is delivered through a catheter, commonly through the internal jugular or femoral vein, and positioned in the inferior vena cava using fluoroscopic imaging.
  • The filter is retrievable, but retrieval may become more difficult as dwell time increases or if the filter tilts, becomes embedded, or develops clot; patients need follow-up for retrieval planning.
  • Available filter and delivery-system sizes, venous access requirements, and anatomical suitability must be confirmed in the current manufacturer instructions for use.
  • MRI conditions and permitted scan parameters should be verified in the current device labeling before imaging. Do not assume that a filter is unrestricted for MRI.
  • Potential complications include access-site bleeding, filter migration, tilt, fracture, penetration of the vena cava wall, filter thrombosis, and recurrent or new deep vein thrombosis.

Procedures that use this device

Linked Studies (10)

PubMed • 2022

Case report: Endoluminal removal of a retrievable conical inferior vena cava filter with a ruptured retraction hook attached to the wall.

Frontiers in surgery

Case Report View Source →
PubMed • 2016

Factors affecting Cook Gunther Tulip and Cook Celect inferior vena cava filter retrieval success.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Safety and efficacy of the Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: midterm outcomes.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2013

Successful removal of a Gunther tulip vena cava filter with wall-embedded hook and migration during a retrieval attempt.

Acta radiologica short reports

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2013

Retrieval of gunther tulip vena cava filter with thrombosed hook and a leg incorporated into the vena cava wall.

Annals of vascular diseases

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Endovascular repair of a perforation of the vena caval wall caused by the retrieval of a Gunther Tulip filter after long-term implantation.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Form and function of vena cava filters: how do optional filters measure up?

Vascular

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2007

Evaluation of retrievability of the Gunther tulip vena cava filter.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2005

New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval--in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Post-Market Celect Platinum Vena Cava Filter and Gunther Tulip Retrieval Set Study

View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter?

The filter is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism, particularly those with contraindications to anticoagulation or requiring temporary protection.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism and successful retrieval in many cases, with midterm integrity and efficacy being satisfactory.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate complications such as filter migration, vena cava wall perforation, and retrieval difficulties due to thrombus or filter tilt.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you