Impella Cp Introducer
FDA Clearance Information
The Impella CP Introducer was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on November 18, 2019. It is manufactured by Abiomed and classified as a Class 2 device under product code DYB.
What It Is
FDA-Cleared Indications
- Facilitates percutaneous insertion of the Impella CP device through the arterial system.
- Provides access for temporary mechanical circulatory support with the Impella CP pump during indicated cardiac procedures.
Clinical Applications
- Femoral arterial access for placement of an Impella CP pump in patients requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support.
- Use during catheter-based treatment of cardiogenic shock when Impella CP support is indicated.
- Use during selected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures when temporary circulatory support is indicated.
Evidence Summary
Reported Outcomes
Safety Profile
Evidence Limitations
Practical Considerations
- This is a large-bore arterial introducer and requires assessment of vessel size, calcification, tortuosity and peripheral arterial disease before placement.
- The access site is typically the common femoral artery, with imaging guidance and vascular-access management used to reduce complications.
- Compatibility is limited to the intended Impella CP system and associated accessories; the manufacturer's instructions for use should be followed.
- Potential complications include bleeding, hematoma, limb ischemia, arterial injury, thrombosis, infection and need for vascular repair.
- MRI safety and conditions depend on the specific introducer and the complete Impella system; it should not be considered MRI safe unless the current device labeling confirms the applicable conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for Impella CP Introducer?
The Impella CP Introducer is indicated for use in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support, such as those with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk cardiac procedures.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Clinical studies have reported a significant reduction in access site bleeding when using a 16 Fr sheath compared to conventional sheaths.
What complications have been reported?
Safety data from evidence indicate complications such as access site bleeding and potential limb ischemia, although the latter can be mitigated with antegrade perfusion.