📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Medtronic 6957

Medtronic Vascular

Compare similar devices

Summary: The Medtronic 6957 is an IVC filter designed for preventing pulmonary embolism. It is FDA-cleared and supported by 10 studies, focusing on its clinical efficacy and safety.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K843706 ↗
Decision Date ? December 27, 1984
Product Code ? DTB
Device Class ? Class 3
Evidence ? 0 studies

The Medtronic 6957 was cleared through the FDA 510k pathway on December 27, 1984. It is manufactured by Medtronic Vascular and classified as a Class 3 device.

What It Is

The Medtronic 6957 is an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter used to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing blood clots. It is intended for use in patients at risk of thromboembolic events.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping emboli in the inferior vena cava.
  • Use in patients at risk for thromboembolic disease when anticoagulation therapy is contraindicated, ineffective, or not possible.

Clinical Applications

  • Placement in the inferior vena cava to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism.
  • Protection from pulmonary embolism in patients who cannot receive anticoagulant medication.
  • Use when thromboembolic risk persists despite anticoagulation or when anticoagulation is not clinically suitable.
  • Placement during an IVC filter procedure using imaging guidance and venous access.

Reported off-label uses

  • Temporary protection from pulmonary embolism in selected trauma patients at very high risk when anticoagulation is delayed or contraindicated.
  • Use in selected patients with recurrent pulmonary embolism despite therapeutic anticoagulation.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes 10 studies, with various types such as RCTs and prospective trials, spanning from 2023 to 2026. These studies evaluate the device's efficacy and safety.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report on the Medtronic 6957's effectiveness in reducing the incidence of pulmonary embolism. However, specific outcomes from the provided evidence are not detailed.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include device migration and vena cava perforation. However, specific safety data from the provided evidence is not detailed.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence lacks detailed outcomes and safety data specific to the Medtronic 6957. Further research is needed to establish long-term efficacy and safety profiles.

Practical Considerations

  • The available labeling and public device information should be reviewed for the filter's dimensions, delivery-system requirements, and recommended venous access technique.
  • The IVC should be evaluated with appropriate imaging before placement to assess anatomy, diameter, thrombus, and renal venous anatomy.
  • Anticoagulation remains the usual treatment for venous thromboembolism when it can be given safely; an IVC filter does not treat existing deep-vein thrombosis.
  • MRI safety and conditions should be confirmed from the device-specific labeling. Do not assume that a legacy filter is MR safe or MR conditional without documentation.
  • Potential complications include access-site bleeding, filter migration, malposition, IVC perforation, filter thrombosis, recurrent deep-vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.

Procedures that use this device

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Medtronic 6957?

The Medtronic 6957 is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism, particularly those who cannot undergo anticoagulation therapy.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Specific outcomes from the provided evidence are not detailed, but the device is generally reported to be effective in reducing pulmonary embolism incidence.

What complications have been reported?

Reported complications include device migration and vena cava perforation, though specific safety data from the provided evidence is not detailed.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you