Optease Vena Cava Filter and Optease Retrieval Cathteter
Cordis, A Johnson & Johnson
FDA Clearance Information
The Optease Vena Cava Filter was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on March 7, 2014. It is manufactured by Cordis, a Johnson & Johnson company, and is classified as a Class 2 medical device.
What It Is
FDA-Cleared Indications
- Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping thromboemboli in the inferior vena cava.
- Use in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism who require temporary vena cava filtration.
- Use when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, ineffective, or not possible, according to the device labeling.
Clinical Applications
- Percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism.
- Temporary protection for patients with venous thromboembolism who cannot receive anticoagulation.
- Use when pulmonary embolism risk persists despite anticoagulation or anticoagulation is not effective, when consistent with the cleared labeling.
- Percutaneous retrieval when protection is no longer needed and removal is clinically appropriate.
Reported off-label uses
- Prophylactic placement in selected trauma or surgical patients who do not have documented venous thromboembolism but are considered at high risk for pulmonary embolism.
- Use in selected patients with recurrent pulmonary embolism despite anticoagulation.
Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.
Evidence Summary
Reported Outcomes
Safety Profile
Evidence Limitations
Practical Considerations
- The filter is delivered through a catheter and positioned in the inferior vena cava under fluoroscopic imaging; venography may be used to assess anatomy before deployment.
- The device is intended for retrievable use, but removal may become difficult or impossible if the filter tilts, embeds, migrates, fractures, or develops substantial tissue growth.
- The access route and filter size must match the patient's venous anatomy and the device's labeled delivery-system requirements; the manufacturer’s current instructions for use should be checked.
- MRI conditions, including magnetic-field strength and scan parameters, should be verified in the current device labeling before imaging.
- Contraindications and precautions include unsuitable IVC anatomy, venous thrombosis at the intended access or deployment site, infection, contrast allergy, and inability to tolerate the procedure or necessary imaging.
Procedures that use this device
Linked Studies (15)
Endovascular retrieval of a fractured Optease inferior vena cava filter using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance.
Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →The use of optional inferior vena cava filters of type Optease in trauma patients--a single type of filter in a single Medical Center.
Thrombosis research
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Troubleshooting OptEase inferior vena cava filter retrieval.
Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Difficult OptEase filter retrievals after prolonged indwelling times.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →Long-term safety and effectiveness of the "OptEase" vena cava filter.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Update on vena cava filters.
Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Histology of tissue adherent to OptEase inferior vena cava filters regarding indwelling time.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →OptEase and TrapEase vena cava filters: a single-center experience in 258 patients.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Retrospective View Source →Long-term retrievability of IVC filters: should we abandon permanent devices?
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Form and function of vena cava filters: how do optional filters measure up?
Vascular
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience.
Vascular
View Source →Protection From Pulmonary Embolism With the Permanent OptEase™ Filter (PROOF)
View Source →Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for Optease Vena Cava Filter?
The Optease Vena Cava Filter is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism who cannot undergo anticoagulation therapy.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Clinical studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism, but highlight challenges in retrieval and potential complications.
What complications have been reported?
Safety data indicate complications such as filter migration, fracture, and difficult retrieval, potentially leading to vascular damage.