Optease Vena Cava Filter and Retrieval Catheter
Cordis Corp., A Johnson & Johnson
FDA Clearance Information
The Optease Vena Cava Filter was cleared via the FDA 510(k) pathway on February 4, 2010. It is manufactured by Cordis Corp., a Johnson & Johnson company, and is classified as a Class 2 medical device.
What It Is
FDA-Cleared Indications
- Prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.
- Use when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, unsuccessful, or not tolerated.
- Temporary placement in the inferior vena cava with intended retrieval when protection from pulmonary embolism is no longer needed.
Clinical Applications
- Percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava to prevent pulmonary embolism.
- Temporary protection from pulmonary embolism in patients who cannot receive anticoagulation.
- Use in selected patients with venous thromboembolism despite anticoagulation, when clinically indicated by the treating team.
- Retrieval after the risk of pulmonary embolism has decreased or anticoagulation can be used safely.
Reported off-label uses
- Prophylactic placement in selected high-risk trauma patients without documented venous thromboembolism.
- Use in selected patients with limited cardiopulmonary reserve who are considered at unusually high risk from pulmonary embolism.
Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.
Evidence Summary
Reported Outcomes
Safety Profile
Evidence Limitations
Practical Considerations
- The filter is delivered through a catheter, commonly through femoral or jugular venous access, under fluoroscopic imaging.
- Available filter and catheter sizes, deployment limits, and retrieval requirements must be matched to the patient's IVC diameter and anatomy according to the current instructions for use.
- Retrieval should be considered once protection is no longer clinically needed because prolonged dwell time can make removal more difficult and may increase device-related complications.
- MRI conditions and artifact depend on the specific device labeling; confirm the current manufacturer MRI guidance before scanning.
- Potential complications include filter migration, tilt, fracture, IVC perforation, access-site bleeding, caval thrombosis, and difficulty or failure of retrieval.
Procedures that use this device
Linked Studies (15)
Endovascular retrieval of a fractured Optease inferior vena cava filter using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance.
Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →The use of optional inferior vena cava filters of type Optease in trauma patients--a single type of filter in a single Medical Center.
Thrombosis research
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Troubleshooting OptEase inferior vena cava filter retrieval.
Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Difficult OptEase filter retrievals after prolonged indwelling times.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →Long-term safety and effectiveness of the "OptEase" vena cava filter.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Update on vena cava filters.
Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Histology of tissue adherent to OptEase inferior vena cava filters regarding indwelling time.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →OptEase and TrapEase vena cava filters: a single-center experience in 258 patients.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Retrospective View Source →Long-term retrievability of IVC filters: should we abandon permanent devices?
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Form and function of vena cava filters: how do optional filters measure up?
Vascular
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience.
Vascular
View Source →Protection From Pulmonary Embolism With the Permanent OptEase™ Filter (PROOF)
View Source →Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for Optease Vena Cava Filter?
The filter is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism who cannot undergo anticoagulation therapy.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism, but highlight challenges in retrieval and associated complications.
What complications have been reported?
Safety data indicate complications such as filter fracture, difficult retrieval, and caval pseudoaneurysms.