📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Optease Vena Cava Filter and Retrieval Catheter

Cordis Corp., A Johnson & Johnson

Compare similar devices

Summary: The Optease Vena Cava Filter is a retrievable device used to prevent pulmonary embolism. Key evidence highlights challenges in retrieval and associated complications.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K091077 ↗
Decision Date ? February 4, 2010
Product Code ? DTK Filter, Intravascular, Cardiovascular
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 15 studies

The Optease Vena Cava Filter was cleared via the FDA 510(k) pathway on February 4, 2010. It is manufactured by Cordis Corp., a Johnson & Johnson company, and is classified as a Class 2 medical device.

What It Is

The Optease Vena Cava Filter is a retrievable filter designed to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing blood clots in the inferior vena cava. It is intended for temporary placement in patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.
  • Use when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, unsuccessful, or not tolerated.
  • Temporary placement in the inferior vena cava with intended retrieval when protection from pulmonary embolism is no longer needed.

Clinical Applications

  • Percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava to prevent pulmonary embolism.
  • Temporary protection from pulmonary embolism in patients who cannot receive anticoagulation.
  • Use in selected patients with venous thromboembolism despite anticoagulation, when clinically indicated by the treating team.
  • Retrieval after the risk of pulmonary embolism has decreased or anticoagulation can be used safely.

Reported off-label uses

  • Prophylactic placement in selected high-risk trauma patients without documented venous thromboembolism.
  • Use in selected patients with limited cardiopulmonary reserve who are considered at unusually high risk from pulmonary embolism.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The literature includes 11 studies, comprising various study types such as case series and retrospective analyses, published between 2016 and 2023. These studies explore retrieval techniques, complications, and clinical outcomes.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Optease Vena Cava Filter effectively prevents pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients. However, retrieval can be challenging, particularly after prolonged indwelling times. Some studies highlight the need for advanced retrieval techniques.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include filter fracture, difficult retrieval, and the development of caval pseudoaneurysms. These complications underscore the importance of timely retrieval and careful patient monitoring.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the retrospective nature of many studies and small sample sizes. Further research is needed to optimize retrieval techniques and better understand long-term outcomes and complications.

Practical Considerations

  • The filter is delivered through a catheter, commonly through femoral or jugular venous access, under fluoroscopic imaging.
  • Available filter and catheter sizes, deployment limits, and retrieval requirements must be matched to the patient's IVC diameter and anatomy according to the current instructions for use.
  • Retrieval should be considered once protection is no longer clinically needed because prolonged dwell time can make removal more difficult and may increase device-related complications.
  • MRI conditions and artifact depend on the specific device labeling; confirm the current manufacturer MRI guidance before scanning.
  • Potential complications include filter migration, tilt, fracture, IVC perforation, access-site bleeding, caval thrombosis, and difficulty or failure of retrieval.

Procedures that use this device

Linked Studies (15)

PubMed • 2023

Endovascular retrieval of a fractured Optease inferior vena cava filter using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance.

Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2016

The use of optional inferior vena cava filters of type Optease in trauma patients--a single type of filter in a single Medical Center.

Thrombosis research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2016

Troubleshooting OptEase inferior vena cava filter retrieval.

Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2016

Retrieval of TRAPEASE and OPTEASE Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Extended Dwell Times.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Difficult OptEase filter retrievals after prolonged indwelling times.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optease vena cava filter optimal indwelling time and retrievability.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Long-term safety and effectiveness of the "OptEase" vena cava filter.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2010

Update on vena cava filters.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Histology of tissue adherent to OptEase inferior vena cava filters regarding indwelling time.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2009

OptEase and TrapEase vena cava filters: a single-center experience in 258 patients.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

Retrospective View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Long-term retrievability of IVC filters: should we abandon permanent devices?

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Form and function of vena cava filters: how do optional filters measure up?

Vascular

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2006

The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2006

OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience.

Vascular

View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Protection From Pulmonary Embolism With the Permanent OptEase™ Filter (PROOF)

View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Optease Vena Cava Filter?

The filter is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism who cannot undergo anticoagulation therapy.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism, but highlight challenges in retrieval and associated complications.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate complications such as filter fracture, difficult retrieval, and caval pseudoaneurysms.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you