Percutaneous Greenfield Vena Cava Filter System
Medi-Tech
FDA Clearance Information
The percutaneous Greenfield vena cava filter system was cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) pathway on November 1, 1985. It is manufactured by Medi-Tech and classified as a Class 2 device.
What It Is
FDA-Cleared Indications
- Prevention of pulmonary embolism by trapping thrombi in the inferior vena cava.
- Use in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or ineffective.
Clinical Applications
- Percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava for pulmonary embolism protection.
- Protection from pulmonary embolism in patients with venous thromboembolism who cannot receive anticoagulation.
- Use when pulmonary embolism risk persists despite anticoagulant treatment.
Reported off-label uses
- Prophylactic placement in selected patients at exceptionally high risk for venous thromboembolism who do not have documented acute venous thromboembolism.
- Use for prevention of pulmonary embolism in selected high-risk trauma or surgical patients when the expected benefit is judged to outweigh device-related risks.
Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.
Evidence Summary
Reported Outcomes
Safety Profile
Evidence Limitations
Practical Considerations
- The filter is intended for placement in the inferior vena cava, usually through percutaneous venous access with fluoroscopic imaging.
- Available filter sizes and delivery-system dimensions depend on the specific model and labeling; vessel diameter should be assessed before placement.
- The device is a permanent vena cava filter unless the specific model labeling states otherwise; retrieval should not be assumed.
- MRI safety and conditions depend on the exact filter model and its labeling. Confirm the model and current MRI instructions before scanning.
- Potential complications include access-site bleeding, filter migration, malposition, vena cava perforation, filter thrombosis, recurrent pulmonary embolism, and long-term changes in the vena cava.
Procedures that use this device
Linked Studies (20)
Greenfield stainless steel vena cava filters on computed tomography follow-up.
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Other View Source →Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
Journal of biomechanical engineering
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →In vivo evaluation of the effects of gravitational force (+Gz) on over-the-wire stainless steel Greenfield inferior vena cava filter in swine.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →Entrapment of J-tip guidewires by Venatech and stainless-steel Greenfield vena cava filters during central venous catheter placement: percutaneous management in four patients.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →IVC filter tilt and asymmetry: comparison of the over-the-wire stainless-steel and titanium Greenfield IVC filters.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Suprarenal filter placement.
Journal of vascular surgery
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Evaluation of a new percutaneous stainless steel Greenfield filter.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Successful retrieval of a titanium Greenfield vena cava filter embedded within its introducer sheath.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
View Source →Caval interruption methods: comparison of options.
Seminars in vascular surgery
View Source →The new titanium Greenfield vena cava filter: initial experience and review.
Singapore medical journal
Case Series View Source →[Partial interruption of the inferior vena cava using a Greenfield titanium percutaneous filter. Present indications and evaluation].
Journal des maladies vasculaires
Prospective View Source →Management of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity in pregnancy.
The West Virginia medical journal
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: experimental in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →LGM vena cava filter: objective evaluation of early results.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
View Source →Perforation of the inferior vena cava by a suprarenal Greenfield filter.
Radiology
View Source →Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters.
Radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Comparison of titanium and stainless steel, Greenfield vena caval filters.
Surgery
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Percutaneous transfemoral placement of the Kimray-Greenfield vena cava filter.
Radiology
View Source →Experimental comparison of percutaneous vena caval devices: titanium Greenfield filter versus bird's nest filter.
Journal of vascular surgery
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Percutaneous Kimray-Greenfield filter placement.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
View Source →Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for the percutaneous Greenfield vena cava filter system?
The device is indicated for patients at risk of thromboembolic events, particularly when anticoagulation is contraindicated or ineffective.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Studies have reported a reduction in recurrent pulmonary embolism and a high survival probability over a one-year follow-up.
What complications have been reported?
Complications reported include guidewire entrapment, filter thrombosis, and rare instances of filter fragmentation and displacement.