📊 Evidence-Based Reference

permanent pacing lead

Oscor Medical

Summary: The permanent pacing lead by Oscor Medical is used in cardiac pacing for patients with arrhythmias. Key evidence highlights include cases of lead migration and associated complications.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway 510K
Decision Date May 7, 1991
Product Code DTB
Device Class Class 3
Evidence 0 studies

The permanent pacing lead by Oscor Medical was cleared via the FDA 510k pathway on May 7, 1991. It is classified as a Class 3 device under product code DTB.

What It Is

The permanent pacing lead is a device used in cardiac pacing systems to deliver electrical impulses to the heart. It is intended for patients requiring long-term pacing due to arrhythmias.

Clinical Applications

This device is commonly used in patients with complete atrioventricular block or other bradyarrhythmias requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. It is typically placed transvenously.

Evidence Summary

The literature includes 15 studies, comprising case reports and other observational studies, published between 2022 and 2023. These studies explore complications and outcomes associated with the device.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report outcomes such as successful pacing and resolution of arrhythmias. However, cases of lead migration and perforation have been documented, requiring surgical intervention.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include cardiac perforation, lead migration, and infection. Surgical removal and repair were necessary in some cases, highlighting the potential risks associated with the device.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the small number of case reports and lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Further research is needed to better understand long-term outcomes and safety profiles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for permanent pacing lead?

The device is indicated for patients with arrhythmias requiring permanent pacing, such as complete atrioventricular block.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report successful pacing and arrhythmia resolution, but also document cases of lead migration and perforation.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate complications such as cardiac perforation, lead migration, and infection, sometimes necessitating surgical intervention.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 Stay Updated

Get the latest vascular education content delivered to your inbox.