📊 Evidence-Based Reference

silverhawk peripheral plaque excision system

Foxhollow Technologies

Summary: The SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System is a catheter-based device used for atherectomy in peripheral artery disease. It is primarily used to remove atheromatous plaque from peripheral arteries. Key evidence highlights its use in combination with other treatments for improved outcomes.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway 510K
Decision Date October 23, 2006
Product Code MCW
Device Class Class 2
Evidence 7 studies

The SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on October 23, 2006. Manufactured by Foxhollow Technologies, it is classified as a Class 2 medical device.

What It Is

The SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System is a catheter-based atherectomy device designed to excise atheromatous plaque from peripheral arteries. It is intended for use in patients with peripheral artery disease to improve blood flow by removing plaque.

Clinical Applications

Commonly used in the treatment of peripheral artery disease, the SilverHawk system is applied in scenarios where plaque removal is necessary to restore arterial patency. It is often used in conjunction with other endovascular procedures.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes a mix of RCTs, prospective, and retrospective studies, with a total of 10 studies reviewed. These studies span from 2007 to 2016, focusing on the device's efficacy and safety in various clinical settings.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the SilverHawk system is effective in improving arterial patency and reducing symptoms in patients with peripheral artery disease. Some studies highlight its use in combination with drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for enhanced outcomes. However, long-term benefits over traditional angioplasty remain inconclusive.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include vascular injury and restenosis, which are common concerns with atherectomy devices. Some studies note the potential for device-related complications, but overall safety profiles are consistent with other endovascular interventions.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the lack of long-term follow-up data and small sample sizes in some studies. Further research is needed to establish the long-term efficacy and safety of the SilverHawk system compared to other treatment modalities.

Linked Studies (7)

PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Atherectomy for infrainguinal peripheral artery disease.

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists

View Source →
PubMed • 2007

Infrainguinal arterial intervention: is there a role for an atherectomy device?

Vascular

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2007

Treatment of an Angio-Seal-related vascular complication using the SilverHawk plaque excision system: a case report.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2006

Plaque excision for the treatment of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.

Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Study of the SilverHawk™ /TurboHawk™ Plaque Excision Systems Used With SpiderFX to Treat Calcified Peripheral Arterial Disease (DEFINITIVE Ca++)

View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Study of SilverHawk®/TurboHawk® in Lower Extremity Vessels (DEFINITIVE™ LE)

View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System?

The device is indicated for the excision of atheromatous plaque in patients with peripheral artery disease to improve blood flow.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report improved arterial patency and symptom relief, particularly when used with adjunctive therapies like drug-eluting balloons.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate potential complications such as vascular injury and restenosis, consistent with other atherectomy devices.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 Stay Updated

Get the latest vascular education content delivered to your inbox.