📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Silverhawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System Turbohawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System

Medtronic Vascular

Product: TurboHawk — all models and sizes

Compare similar devices

Summary: The SilverHawk and TurboHawk are atherectomy devices used for plaque excision in peripheral arteries. They are primarily used in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Key evidence highlights their role in reducing restenosis rates compared to traditional angioplasty.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K170191 ↗
Decision Date ? June 16, 2017
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 7 studies

The SilverHawk and TurboHawk systems were cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on June 16, 2017. Manufactured by Medtronic Vascular, these devices are classified as Class 2 under product code MCW.

What It Is

The SilverHawk and TurboHawk are directional atherectomy devices designed to excise atheromatous plaque from peripheral arteries. They are used to treat peripheral artery disease by removing plaque and restoring blood flow, thereby reducing the risk of restenosis.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from peripheral arteries.
  • Treatment of peripheral arterial lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease.
  • Use in infrainguinal peripheral arteries when plaque excision is clinically appropriate.

Clinical Applications

  • Directional atherectomy of femoropopliteal peripheral arterial lesions.
  • Plaque removal in selected peripheral arteries causing symptomatic arterial narrowing.
  • Endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease in patients with claudication or limb-threatening ischemia when plaque excision is indicated.
  • Lesion preparation before or alongside other endovascular treatments, such as balloon angioplasty, when consistent with the device labeling and treatment plan.

Reported off-label uses

  • Use in peripheral arterial segments or lesion types outside the device-specific cleared labeling may occur in clinical practice, but this is off-label and should be determined by the treating physician.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes a mix of randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies, with a total of 10 studies reviewed. The studies span from 2007 to 2016, focusing on the efficacy and safety of directional atherectomy in peripheral artery disease.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the use of SilverHawk and TurboHawk devices in directional atherectomy can effectively reduce restenosis rates compared to conventional angioplasty. The DEFINITIVE LE study highlighted their safety and effectiveness in treating infrainguinal arteries. Other studies suggest potential benefits when combined with drug-eluting balloon angioplasty.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include vascular injury and restenosis, although these are less frequent compared to traditional angioplasty. The devices have been associated with a favorable safety profile in the treatment of peripheral artery disease.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the lack of long-term follow-up data and the relatively small sample sizes in some studies. Further research is needed to establish the long-term efficacy and safety of these devices, particularly in diverse patient populations.

Practical Considerations

  • The catheter size and working length must match the target vessel, lesion characteristics, guidewire, sheath, and compatible imaging equipment.
  • Treatment is performed under fluoroscopic imaging through vascular access, commonly from the common femoral artery; local anesthesia with moderate sedation or other anesthesia may be used.
  • The device removes plaque into a collection chamber that may require emptying during the procedure; careful device advancement and cutter orientation are important.
  • Potential complications include distal embolization, vessel dissection or perforation, thrombosis, bleeding at the access site, contrast reaction, kidney injury, and need for additional treatment.
  • MRI safety depends on the specific device components and whether they remain in the patient. The catheter is generally removed after treatment; patients should verify the exact model and labeling before MRI.

Linked Studies (7)

PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Atherectomy for infrainguinal peripheral artery disease.

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists

View Source →
PubMed • 2007

Infrainguinal arterial intervention: is there a role for an atherectomy device?

Vascular

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2007

Treatment of an Angio-Seal-related vascular complication using the SilverHawk plaque excision system: a case report.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2006

Plaque excision for the treatment of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.

Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Study of the SilverHawk™ /TurboHawk™ Plaque Excision Systems Used With SpiderFX to Treat Calcified Peripheral Arterial Disease (DEFINITIVE Ca++)

View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Study of SilverHawk®/TurboHawk® in Lower Extremity Vessels (DEFINITIVE™ LE)

View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for SilverHawk and TurboHawk?

These devices are indicated for the excision of atheromatous plaque in patients with peripheral artery disease, particularly in infrainguinal arteries.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report reduced restenosis rates and improved blood flow in treated arteries, with a favorable safety profile.

What complications have been reported?

Reported complications include vascular injury and restenosis, though these are less frequent compared to traditional angioplasty.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you