Summary: The Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems, manufactured by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., are used in hip arthroplasty procedures. Key evidence highlights include a 4.9% ten-year revision estimate for the Exeter V40 short revision stem.
The Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems were cleared through the FDA 510(k) pathway on December 21, 2023. Manufactured by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., these devices are classified as Class 2 under product code LPH.
What It Is
The Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems are medical devices designed for use in hip arthroplasty procedures. They are intended to replace or revise hip joints, providing stability and mobility for patients with hip joint issues.
Clinical Applications
These hip systems are commonly used in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty procedures. They are particularly useful in cases requiring smaller stem sizes or specific offsets to accommodate patient anatomy.
Evidence Summary
The available literature includes five studies, with types ranging from randomized controlled trials to case series. The studies span from 2020 to 2023, providing insights into the clinical performance of the hip systems.
Reported Outcomes
Published studies report a 2.8% revision estimate for the Exeter V40 stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. The ten-year revision estimate for the 44/00/125 stem is 4.9%, with a hazard ratio of 1.8 compared to other Exeter V40 stems.
Safety Profile
Reported complications include an increased revision estimate for the 44/00/125 stem. Surgeons and patients should be aware of this potential risk when considering the device for hip arthroplasty.
Evidence Limitations
The evidence is limited by the lack of randomized controlled trials specifically addressing the Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and safety in diverse patient populations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems?
The systems are indicated for use in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty procedures, particularly when specific stem sizes or offsets are required.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Clinical studies have reported a 2.8% revision estimate for the Exeter V40 stem and a 4.9% ten-year revision estimate for the 44/00/125 stem.
What complications have been reported?
Reported complications include an increased revision estimate for the 44/00/125 stem, highlighting the need for careful consideration in its use.
Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference.
It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use.
Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.
📬 Stay Updated
Get the latest vascular education content delivered to your inbox.