Titanium Greenfield Vena Cava Filter Carrier
Medi-Tech
FDA Clearance Information
The titanium Greenfield vena cava filter was cleared by the FDA through the 510k pathway on November 4, 1988. Manufactured by Medi-Tech, it is classified as a Class 2 medical device.
What It Is
FDA-Cleared Indications
- Prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism through placement in the inferior vena cava.
- Use in patients with thromboembolic disease when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated.
- Use when anticoagulant therapy is unsuccessful or complications from anticoagulation occur.
Clinical Applications
- Percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava.
- Protection against pulmonary embolism in selected patients with deep venous thrombosis.
- Pulmonary embolism prevention when anticoagulation cannot be given.
- Pulmonary embolism prevention when anticoagulation has failed or caused complications.
Reported off-label uses
- Prophylactic placement in selected patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism who do not have documented acute venous thrombosis.
- Use in selected trauma or surgical patients when temporary protection from pulmonary embolism is considered necessary.
Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.
Evidence Summary
Reported Outcomes
Safety Profile
Evidence Limitations
Practical Considerations
- This is a permanent filter design; retrieval is not generally the intended use.
- Placement requires a compatible delivery system and imaging guidance, commonly through venous access in the neck or groin.
- The appropriate filter and carrier size depend on the delivery system, venous anatomy, and inferior vena cava dimensions specified in the device labeling.
- MRI safety and conditions should be confirmed from the original device labeling or manufacturer records before scanning; older records may not provide current MR-conditional information.
- Contraindications and precautions include inability to access the venous system, unsuitable inferior vena cava anatomy, active infection at the access site, and a contraindication to the required procedure or contrast agent.
Procedures that use this device
Linked Studies (20)
Greenfield stainless steel vena cava filters on computed tomography follow-up.
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Other View Source →Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
Journal of biomechanical engineering
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →In vivo evaluation of the effects of gravitational force (+Gz) on over-the-wire stainless steel Greenfield inferior vena cava filter in swine.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
View Source →Entrapment of J-tip guidewires by Venatech and stainless-steel Greenfield vena cava filters during central venous catheter placement: percutaneous management in four patients.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →IVC filter tilt and asymmetry: comparison of the over-the-wire stainless-steel and titanium Greenfield IVC filters.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Suprarenal filter placement.
Journal of vascular surgery
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Evaluation of a new percutaneous stainless steel Greenfield filter.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Successful retrieval of a titanium Greenfield vena cava filter embedded within its introducer sheath.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
View Source →Caval interruption methods: comparison of options.
Seminars in vascular surgery
View Source →The new titanium Greenfield vena cava filter: initial experience and review.
Singapore medical journal
Case Series View Source →[Partial interruption of the inferior vena cava using a Greenfield titanium percutaneous filter. Present indications and evaluation].
Journal des maladies vasculaires
Prospective View Source →Management of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity in pregnancy.
The West Virginia medical journal
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: experimental in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →LGM vena cava filter: objective evaluation of early results.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
View Source →Perforation of the inferior vena cava by a suprarenal Greenfield filter.
Radiology
View Source →Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters.
Radiology
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Comparison of titanium and stainless steel, Greenfield vena caval filters.
Surgery
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Percutaneous transfemoral placement of the Kimray-Greenfield vena cava filter.
Radiology
View Source →Experimental comparison of percutaneous vena caval devices: titanium Greenfield filter versus bird's nest filter.
Journal of vascular surgery
RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →Percutaneous Kimray-Greenfield filter placement.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
View Source →Frequently Asked Questions
What are the clinical indications for titanium Greenfield vena cava filter?
The device is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism who have contraindications to anticoagulation therapy.
What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?
Studies report successful insertion and no complications or filter migration in patients.
What complications have been reported?
No complications such as bruising, hematoma, or bleeding were reported in the studies.