📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Vena Cava Filter

Vena-Tech

Compare similar devices

Summary: The Vena-Tech vena cava filter is a medical device used to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing blood clots in the inferior vena cava. Key evidence highlights complications associated with retrieval and long-term use.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K881604 ↗
Decision Date ? March 10, 1989
Product Code ? DTK Filter, Intravascular, Cardiovascular
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 0 studies

The Vena-Tech vena cava filter was cleared by the FDA via the 510k pathway on March 10, 1989. It is manufactured by Vena-Tech and classified as a Class 2 medical device.

What It Is

The vena cava filter is a device designed to prevent pulmonary embolism by trapping blood clots traveling from the lower extremities to the lungs. It is typically used in patients who cannot undergo anticoagulation therapy.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism by filtering thrombi from the venous circulation.
  • Use in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism when anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated.

Clinical Applications

  • Placement in the inferior vena cava for protection against pulmonary embolism.
  • Use in patients with venous thromboembolism who cannot receive anticoagulant medication.
  • Use when protection from embolization is clinically needed during management of thromboembolic disease.

Reported off-label uses

  • Temporary protection from pulmonary embolism in selected trauma or critically ill patients when anticoagulation is not possible.
  • Use in selected patients with recurrent pulmonary embolism despite therapeutic anticoagulation.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The literature includes 15 studies, comprising systematic reviews, case series, and narrative reviews, published up to 2024. These studies explore complications, retrieval techniques, and clinical guidelines for use.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that vena cava filters are effective in preventing pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients. However, there is a noted increase in complications during retrieval, especially with prolonged dwell times.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include filter migration, tilt, and thrombosis, as well as long-term issues such as caval erosion and post-thrombotic syndrome. Retrieval complications increase with longer implantation periods.

Evidence Limitations

Current evidence is limited by a lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Many studies are retrospective or case series, highlighting the need for more robust prospective research to better understand long-term outcomes and safety.

Practical Considerations

  • The filter is intended for placement in the inferior vena cava and requires appropriate vessel imaging and sizing before deployment.
  • Access is commonly obtained through a femoral or internal jugular vein, with fluoroscopic or other imaging guidance.
  • The original Vena-Tech filter is generally considered a permanent filter; retrieval should not be assumed unless the specific device labeling and clinical assessment support it.
  • Long-term risks can include filter thrombosis, migration, penetration of the vena cava wall, fracture, and recurrent deep vein thrombosis.
  • MRI conditions should be confirmed from the device-specific labeling and the current institutional MRI safety policy before scanning.

Procedures that use this device

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for vena cava filter?

Indications include prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, and prophylactic use in high-risk trauma or critically ill patients.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism, but highlight increased complications with longer filter dwell times.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate complications such as filter migration, tilt, thrombosis, and long-term caval erosion, with increased retrieval difficulties over time.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you