📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Diamondback 360 Degree Orbital Atherectomy System

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System is a device used for atherectomy in calcified coronary and peripheral arterial lesions. Key evidence highlights its efficacy in treating severely calcified lesions with favorable procedural outcomes.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K071350 ↗
Decision Date ? August 22, 2007
Product Code ? MCW Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 19 studies

The Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on August 22, 2007. It is manufactured by Cardiovascular Systems and classified as a Class 2 device under product code MCW.

What It Is

The Diamondback 360 is an orbital atherectomy system designed to remove calcified plaque from coronary and peripheral arteries. It uses a diamond-coated crown that orbits within the vessel, sanding away plaque while preserving healthy tissue.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Atherectomy of peripheral arterial lesions that are stenotic or occlusive and contain calcified plaque.
  • Treatment of de novo or restenotic peripheral artery lesions when plaque modification is needed before or instead of balloon angioplasty.
  • Use in coronary arteries for treatment of severely calcified lesions when the specific system configuration is cleared for coronary atherectomy.

Clinical Applications

  • Plaque modification in calcified peripheral arterial disease before balloon angioplasty or stent placement.
  • Treatment of calcified lesions in lower-extremity arteries, including iliac, femoral, popliteal and infrapopliteal segments when covered by the device labeling.
  • Plaque modification in severely calcified coronary lesions with a coronary-labeled Diamondback 360 system.
  • Creation of a more compliant vessel lumen to facilitate subsequent balloon delivery or expansion in selected calcified lesions.

Reported off-label uses

  • Treatment of heavily calcified arterial lesions in vascular segments or clinical situations not included in the applicable device labeling.
  • Use as an adjunct in complex peripheral interventions where plaque modification is intended to reduce the need for high-pressure ballooning or stenting.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes six studies, comprising randomized controlled trials and observational studies, conducted between 2008 and 2023. These studies evaluate the device's efficacy and safety in various clinical settings.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report favorable procedural outcomes with the Diamondback 360 in treating severely calcified lesions. Optical coherence tomography imaging has quantified the ablation volume, demonstrating its effectiveness in plaque removal. Initial experiences in Europe also indicate successful application in clinical practice.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include potential vessel injury and procedural complications typical of atherectomy procedures. However, specific adverse events were not detailed in the provided evidence.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the small number of studies and lack of long-term follow-up data. Further research is needed to assess long-term safety and efficacy, as well as comparisons with other atherectomy devices.

Practical Considerations

  • The system includes a guidewire-compatible catheter and a diamond-coated orbital crown; available catheter and crown sizes depend on the specific model and vascular territory.
  • It requires appropriate fluoroscopic imaging, compatible guidewire and sheath or guide-catheter access, and continuous saline infusion during operation according to the instructions for use.
  • Device selection depends on vessel diameter, lesion length, calcium distribution, access anatomy and whether the coronary or peripheral system is being used.
  • It is not generally considered MRI-safe while any component remains in the patient; MRI eligibility should be confirmed from the exact model's labeling after removal.
  • Potential complications include dissection, perforation, embolization, thrombosis, spasm, bleeding, access-site complications and distal ischemia. Contraindications and warnings in the current instructions for use must be reviewed before treatment.

Linked Studies (19)

PubMed • 2023

Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Cureus

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2023

Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Japan-USA Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Lesions: COAST Study, Harmonization by Doing Proof-of-Concept.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2022

Coronary orbital atherectomy using a five-French guiding catheter.

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

View Source →
PubMed • 2021

Is crossability of the classic crown with the glide assist superior to the micro crown in the Diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system?

Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Orbital atherectomy for calcified femoropopliteal lesions: a current review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery

View Source →
PubMed • 2019

Iliofemoral peripheral orbital atherectomy for optimizing TAVR access: An innovative strategy in the absence of alternative access options.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2018

Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

The potential cost-effectiveness of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: an economic modeling approach.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2017

Critical hand ischemia treatment via orbital atherectomy-A single center observational retrospective analysis.

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Evaluation of the Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System for treating de novo, severely calcified lesions.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial).

The American journal of cardiology

View Source →
PubMed • 2015

Orbital atherectomy: device evolution and clinical data.

The Journal of invasive cardiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Cost-effectiveness analysis of orbital atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty vs balloon angioplasty alone in subjects with calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Orbital atherectomy for symptomatic lower extremity disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Optimal techniques with the Diamondback 360° System achieve effective results for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Journal of cardiovascular translational research

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2009

Use and abuse of atherectomy: where should it be used?

Seminars in vascular surgery

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: the Diamondback 360 degrees Orbital Atherectomy System.

Expert review of medical devices

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System?

The device is indicated for the treatment of calcified coronary and peripheral arterial lesions, particularly in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies have reported favorable procedural outcomes, including effective plaque removal and improved blood flow in treated vessels.

What complications have been reported?

Reported complications include potential vessel injury and procedural complications, though specific adverse events were not detailed in the evidence provided.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you