📊 Evidence-Based Reference

Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter Set for Femoral Vein Approach Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter Set for Jugular Vein Approach Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter Set for Femoral and Jugular Vein Approach

William Cook Europe ApS

Contact a rep Compare similar devices

Summary: The Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter is a medical device used to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing blood clots. Key evidence highlights its efficacy and safety in various clinical scenarios.

FDA Clearance Information

Pathway ? 510(k)
Number ? K211874 ↗
Decision Date ? July 28, 2021
Product Code ? DTK Filter, Intravascular, Cardiovascular
Device Class ? Class 2
Evidence ? 10 studies

The Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter was cleared by the FDA via the 510(k) pathway on July 28, 2021. It is manufactured by William Cook Europe Aps and classified as a Class 2 device.

What It Is

The Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter is a retrievable filter designed for placement in the inferior vena cava to prevent pulmonary embolism by capturing embolic material. It is intended for use in patients at risk of developing venous thromboembolism.

FDA-Cleared Indications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism by placement of a filter in the inferior vena cava.
  • Use in patients at risk for venous thromboembolism when protection from pulmonary embolism is clinically indicated.
  • Placement through either a femoral vein or jugular vein approach, as applicable to the specific filter set.

Clinical Applications

  • IVC filter placement for prevention of pulmonary embolism in selected patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.
  • Temporary or retrievable IVC filtration when the treating team expects that protection from pulmonary embolism may no longer be needed later.
  • Placement through femoral venous access.
  • Placement through internal jugular venous access.
  • Use in patients for whom pulmonary embolism protection is indicated and anticoagulation is not appropriate or cannot provide adequate protection, when consistent with the device labeling and clinical judgment.

Reported off-label uses

  • Prophylactic IVC filter placement in selected trauma or surgical patients without documented venous thromboembolism, when used outside the labeled indication.
  • Use for prevention of embolization from sources other than lower-extremity or pelvic venous thromboembolism, such as selected upper-extremity or right-heart thrombus scenarios.

Off-label use: these uses are reported in practice or the literature but are not part of the FDA-cleared indications. Physicians may use a cleared device off-label based on their medical judgment; the manufacturer may not promote off-label uses.

Evidence Summary

The available literature includes 11 studies, comprising case series and retrospective analyses, published between 2011 and 2020. These studies evaluate the filter's efficacy, safety, and retrieval outcomes.

Reported Outcomes

Published studies report that the Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter effectively prevents pulmonary embolism in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation. Midterm outcomes indicate satisfactory filter integrity and efficacy, with successful retrieval in many cases.

Safety Profile

Reported complications include filter migration, entanglement with thrombus, and vena cava wall perforation. These events are relatively rare but highlight the importance of careful patient selection and monitoring.

Evidence Limitations

The evidence is limited by the retrospective nature of many studies and small sample sizes. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and optimize retrieval techniques.

Practical Considerations

  • The set is available for femoral, jugular, or combined femoral-and-jugular approaches; the access route depends on venous anatomy, thrombus location, and procedural planning.
  • Placement is generally performed with fluoroscopic or other image guidance through a venous sheath, usually with local anesthesia and moderate sedation when appropriate.
  • The filter should be retrieved when protection is no longer clinically needed if retrieval is feasible; prolonged dwell time can increase the risk of filter thrombosis, migration, penetration, fracture, or retrieval difficulty.
  • Patients should be assessed for contraindications such as unsuitable IVC anatomy, IVC thrombus that prevents safe deployment, active infection at the access site, or inability to safely access the target vein.
  • MRI conditions, maximum compatible vessel and sheath dimensions, filter sizing, and retrieval requirements should be confirmed in the current manufacturer instructions for use before imaging or treatment.

Procedures that use this device

Linked Studies (10)

PubMed • 2022

Case report: Endoluminal removal of a retrievable conical inferior vena cava filter with a ruptured retraction hook attached to the wall.

Frontiers in surgery

Case Report View Source →
PubMed • 2016

Factors affecting Cook Gunther Tulip and Cook Celect inferior vena cava filter retrieval success.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2014

Safety and efficacy of the Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: midterm outcomes.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2013

Successful removal of a Gunther tulip vena cava filter with wall-embedded hook and migration during a retrieval attempt.

Acta radiologica short reports

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2013

Retrieval of gunther tulip vena cava filter with thrombosed hook and a leg incorporated into the vena cava wall.

Annals of vascular diseases

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2011

Endovascular repair of a perforation of the vena caval wall caused by the retrieval of a Gunther Tulip filter after long-term implantation.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2008

Form and function of vena cava filters: how do optional filters measure up?

Vascular

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2007

Evaluation of retrievability of the Gunther tulip vena cava filter.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
PubMed • 2005

New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval--in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin

RCT|prospective|retrospective|case Series|other View Source →
ClinicalTrials.gov

Post-Market Celect Platinum Vena Cava Filter and Gunther Tulip Retrieval Set Study

View Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the clinical indications for Gunther Tulip Vena Cava Filter?

The filter is indicated for patients at risk of pulmonary embolism, particularly those who cannot undergo anticoagulation therapy.

What outcomes have been reported in clinical studies?

Studies report effective prevention of pulmonary embolism and satisfactory filter retrieval rates.

What complications have been reported?

Safety data indicate complications such as filter migration, thrombus entanglement, and vena cava wall perforation.

Disclaimer: This page compiles publicly available regulatory and published clinical evidence for educational reference. It does not constitute medical advice, product endorsement, or a recommendation for clinical use. Always consult manufacturer documentation and clinical judgment for patient care decisions.

📬 The IR Device Brief

One email a month: new FDA clearances, recalls and device pages in vascular & interventional radiology.

We'll email you a link to confirm. Unsubscribe any time.

Suggest edits

For manufacturers and their teams. Each field shows what the page says now: add, remove or rewrite anything, and leave the rest as is. LA Vascular reviews every change before it goes live.

About you